http://morganonscience.com/politics-of-science/rejection-part-iii-conservatism-in-science/ "Get Recognized For The Great Science That You Do!" Fri, 11 May 2012 19:08:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://morganonscience.com/politics-of-science/rejection-part-iii-conservatism-in-science/comment-page-1/#comment-814 Sherwood Helf Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:50:02 +0000 http://morganonscience.com/?p=217#comment-814 I must say, I enjoy reading your article. Maybe you could let me know how I can bookmark it ? I feel I should let you know I found this site through google. I must say, I enjoy reading your article. Maybe you could let me know how I can bookmark it ? I feel I should let you know I found this site through google.

]]> http://morganonscience.com/politics-of-science/rejection-part-iii-conservatism-in-science/comment-page-1/#comment-54 morgan Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:41:44 +0000 http://morganonscience.com/?p=217#comment-54 I agree with you on the difficulty of publishing negative results. I had a student that did 2 years of work for a negative result. It was an important result, yet I know that we won't be able to get more than about a paragraph or two into a paper about it. I know someone who wants to start "The Journal of Negative Results" for exactly that reason... I agree with you on the difficulty of publishing negative results. I had a student that did 2 years of work for a negative result. It was an important result, yet I know that we won’t be able to get more than about a paragraph or two into a paper about it. I know someone who wants to start “The Journal of Negative Results” for exactly that reason…

]]> http://morganonscience.com/politics-of-science/rejection-part-iii-conservatism-in-science/comment-page-1/#comment-53 Rick Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:21:58 +0000 http://morganonscience.com/?p=217#comment-53 You think new stuff is hard to get published, try getting important negative results published. You think new stuff is hard to get published, try getting important negative results published.

]]>